Comments on: mod_perl versus mod_wombat http://www.docunext.com/blog/2008/06/18/mod_perl-versus-mod_wombat/ Open Source Notes, Wiki, Forums. We Proudly Use Debian GNU/Linux Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:30:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Albert http://www.docunext.com/blog/2008/06/18/mod_perl-versus-mod_wombat/#comment-13293 Albert Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:37:42 +0000 http://www.docunext.com/blog/2008/06/18/mod_perl-versus-mod_wombat/#comment-13293 Errr - mod_wombat! Errr - mod_wombat!

]]> By: Albert http://www.docunext.com/blog/2008/06/18/mod_perl-versus-mod_wombat/#comment-13292 Albert Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:35:28 +0000 http://www.docunext.com/blog/2008/06/18/mod_perl-versus-mod_wombat/#comment-13292 Hi Brian, Thanks for the follow-up. I've been noticing that too - it does like memory. I'm definitely interested in trying out mod_lua. Its described as a very light and fast programming language. NICE! Hi Brian, Thanks for the follow-up. I’ve been noticing that too - it does like memory.

I’m definitely interested in trying out mod_lua. Its described as a very light and fast programming language. NICE!

]]> By: Brian McCallister http://www.docunext.com/blog/2008/06/18/mod_perl-versus-mod_wombat/#comment-13291 Brian McCallister Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:24:05 +0000 http://www.docunext.com/blog/2008/06/18/mod_perl-versus-mod_wombat/#comment-13291 mod_perl chews up more memory per thread than I expected, as was pointed out to me during the preso. mod_perl chews up more memory per thread than I expected, as was pointed out to me during the preso.

]]>